Secure.gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// indicates you have actually safely connected to the.gov site. Share sensitive details just on official, safe websites.
- About - The Chief law officer
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
Utilities
- About About
Our Work
- Contact the Division Contact the Division
Report a Violation
- Cases and Matters
- Press Room Press Room
Videos
Publications
- Employment Opportunities Employment Opportunities
Experienced Professionals
Chief law officer ´ s Honors Program
Volunteer and Paid Student Internship Programs
- Civil Rights FOIA Civil Rights FOIA
Emmett Till Act/Cold Case Memoranda
- En español
- About - title=" About" About
- The Chief law officer
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- title=" News" News
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Employment
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
- Our Offices
- Find Help
- Contact Us
Breadcrumb
1. Justice.gov
2. Civil Liberty Division
3. The Fair Housing Act
The Fair Housing Act
- Facebook
- X.
- LinkedIn.
- Email
The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., prohibits discrimination by direct companies of housing, such as property managers and property business as well as other entities, such as municipalities, banks or other lending institutions and homeowners insurance provider whose inequitable practices make housing not available to individuals due to the fact that of:
race or color.
religion.
sex.
nationwide origin.
familial status, or.
impairment.
In cases involving discrimination in mortgage loans or home enhancement loans, the Department might file match under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Department brings cases where there is evidence of a pattern or practice of discrimination or where a rejection of rights to a group of persons raises a concern of general public importance. Where force or risk of force is used to reject or hinder reasonable housing rights, the Department of Justice may set up criminal procedures. The Fair Housing Act likewise offers procedures for handling private grievances of discrimination. Individuals who think that they have actually been victims of an illegal housing practice, may file a problem with the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] or file their own suit in federal or state court. The Department of Justice brings fits on behalf of individuals based upon recommendations from HUD.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Race or Color
One of the main objectives of the Fair Housing Act, when Congress enacted it in 1968, was to forbid race discrimination in sales and rentals of housing. Nevertheless, more than thirty years later, race discrimination in housing continues to be an issue. The bulk of the Justice Department's pattern or practice cases include claims of race discrimination. Sometimes, housing service providers try to camouflage their discrimination by giving false details about accessibility of housing, either stating that nothing was readily available or steering homeseekers to specific areas based on race. Individuals who get such incorrect information or misdirection might have no understanding that they have been victims of discrimination. The Department of Justice has brought lots of cases alleging this type of discrimination based upon race or color. In addition, the Department's Fair Housing Testing Program looks for to discover this sort of concealed discrimination and hold those responsible accountable. Most of the mortgage lending cases brought by the Department under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act have declared discrimination based upon race or color. A few of the Department's cases have also alleged that towns and other city government entities violated the Fair Housing Act when they rejected permits or zoning modifications for housing developments, or relegated them to primarily minority neighborhoods, due to the fact that the prospective citizens were anticipated to be predominantly African-Americans.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Religion
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination in housing based upon religion. This restriction covers instances of overt discrimination versus members of a specific faith as well less direct actions, such as zoning ordinances designed to restrict the use of private homes as a places of worship. The variety of cases submitted considering that 1968 alleging religious discrimination is little in contrast to a few of the other prohibited bases, such as race or nationwide origin. The Act does include a limited exception that permits non-commercial housing run by a spiritual company to reserve such housing to persons of the very same religion.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Sex, Including Unwanted Sexual Advances
The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal to discriminate in housing on the basis of sex. Over the last few years, the Department's focus in this area has been to challenge unwanted sexual advances in housing. Women, especially those who are bad, and with limited housing choices, typically have little option however to tolerate the embarrassment and degradation of sexual harassment or danger having their families and themselves got rid of from their homes. The Department's enforcement program is focused on landlords who develop an illogical living environment by demanding sexual favors from occupants or by developing a sexually hostile environment for them. In this manner we seek both to get relief for tenants who have been dealt with unfairly by a property manager since of sex and likewise hinder other possible abusers by making it clear that they can not continue their conduct without dealing with consequences. In addition, pricing discrimination in mortgage loaning might also adversely affect women, particularly minority women. This kind of discrimination is illegal under both the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon National Origin
The Fair Housing Act forbids discrimination based upon nationwide origin. Such discrimination can be based either upon the nation of an individual's birth or where his or her forefathers originated. Census data show that the Hispanic population is the fastest growing segment of our country's population. The Justice Department has actually taken enforcement action versus municipal governments that have attempted to minimize or restrict the variety of Hispanic families that may live in their communities. We have actually sued lenders under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act when they have imposed more stringent underwriting requirements on mortgage or made loans on less beneficial terms for Hispanic borrowers. The Department has actually likewise taken legal action against lending institutions for discrimination against Native Americans. Other locations of the country have actually experienced an increasing variety of nationwide origin groups within their populations. This consists of brand-new immigrants from Southeastern Asia, such as the Hmong, the previous Soviet Union, and other portions of Eastern Europe. We have actually done something about it versus private property owners who have discriminated versus such people.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Familial Status
The Fair Housing Act, with some exceptions, restricts discrimination in housing versus households with kids under 18. In addition to restricting a straight-out denial of housing to families with children, the Act likewise avoids housing service providers from enforcing any special requirements or conditions on occupants with custody of kids. For instance, landlords may not locate families with children in any single portion of a complex, position an unreasonable constraint on the overall number of persons who may reside in a house, or limit their access to recreational services provided to other tenants. In most circumstances, the modified Fair Housing Act restricts a housing supplier from refusing to rent or offer to households with kids. However, some centers might be designated as Housing for Older Persons (55 years of age). This kind of housing, which meets the standards stated in the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995, may run as "senior" housing. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has actually published policies and additional assistance detailing these statutory requirements.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of impairment in all kinds of housing transactions. The Act specifies individuals with an impairment to indicate those individuals with psychological or physical impairments that substantially restrict several major life activities. The term psychological or physical disability might consist of conditions such as blindness, hearing impairment, movement problems, HIV infection, mental retardation, alcoholism, drug dependency, persistent tiredness, finding out impairment, head injury, and mental disorder. The term major life activity may include seeing, hearing, walking, breathing, performing manual jobs, taking care of one's self, discovering, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act also safeguards persons who have a record of such a problems, or are related to as having such a problems. Current users of illegal controlled compounds, individuals convicted for illegal manufacture or distribution of an illegal drug, sex transgressors, and juvenile wrongdoers are not thought about handicapped under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that status. The Fair Housing Act manages no protections to people with or without specials needs who provide a direct danger to the persons or residential or commercial property of others. Determining whether someone presents such a direct danger needs to be made on an individualized basis, nevertheless, and can not be based upon basic presumptions or speculation about the nature of a disability. The Division's enforcement of the Fair Housing Act's defenses for persons with disabilities has focused on 2 major areas. One is insuring that zoning and other guidelines concerning land use are not utilized to prevent the residential options of these individuals, including needlessly limiting communal, or gather together, property plans, such as group homes. The 2nd area is guaranteeing that newly constructed multifamily housing is built in accordance with the Fair Housing Act's accessibility requirements so that it is available to and usable by people with disabilities, and, in specific, those who utilize wheelchairs. There are other federal statutes that forbid discrimination versus individuals with disabilities, consisting of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is imposed by the Disability Rights Section of the Civil Liberty Division.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability Group Homes
Some individuals with specials needs might live together in congregate living plans, frequently referred to as "group homes." The Fair Housing Act restricts municipalities and other local government entities from making zoning or land usage decisions or implementing land usage policies that exclude or otherwise discriminate against individuals with specials needs. The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal--
- To make use of land use policies or actions that deal with groups of individuals with disabilities less favorably than groups of non-disabled individuals. An example would be an ordinance forbiding housing for individuals with specials needs or a specific type of impairment, such as mental disorder, from finding in a specific area, while permitting other groups of unrelated individuals to live together in that location.
- To take action against, or reject a license, for a home because of the special needs of individuals who live or would live there. An example would be denying a structure authorization for a home due to the fact that it was planned to provide housing for persons with mental retardation.
- To decline to make affordable lodgings in land use and zoning policies and treatments where such lodgings may be necessary to afford individuals or groups of individuals with disabilities an equal opportunity to use and delight in housing. What constitutes a reasonable accommodation is a case-by-case determination. Not all asked for modifications of rules or policies are affordable. If an asked for adjustment enforces an excessive monetary or administrative problem on a local federal government, or if an adjustment produces a basic alteration in a regional government's land usage and zoning scheme, it is not a "affordable" lodging.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability-- Accessibility Features for New Construction
The Fair Housing Act defines discrimination in housing versus individuals with specials needs to consist of a failure "to develop and build" particular new multi-family homes so that they are accessible to and functional by persons with disabilities, and particularly individuals who utilize wheelchairs. The Act needs all newly built multi-family dwellings of 4 or more units meant for first tenancy after March 13, 1991, to have specific functions: an available entrance on an available route, accessible common and public use locations, doors sufficiently broad to accommodate wheelchairs, available routes into and through each house, light switches, electric outlets, and thermostats in accessible area, reinforcements in bathroom walls to accommodate grab bar setups, and functional bathroom and kitchens set up so that a wheelchair can navigate about the space.
Developers, contractors, owners, and designers accountable for the style or building and construction of new multi-family housing might be held responsible under the Fair Housing Act if their structures fail to meet these design requirements. The Department of Justice has brought numerous enforcement actions versus those who failed to do so. The majority of the cases have been solved by consent decrees supplying a variety of kinds of relief, including: retrofitting to bring inaccessible functions into compliance where practical and where it is not-- alternatives (monetary funds or other building and construction requirements) that will offer making other housing units available; training on the availability requirements for those involved in the building procedure; a required that all new housing tasks comply with the accessibility requirements, and monetary relief for those hurt by the offenses. In addition, the Department has looked for to promote ease of access through building codes.
