For years, now, females have actually been losing tasks after bold to reveal the view that biology is real and important.
Companies and public bodies, caught by the demands of extremist trans activists, have exacted vicious punishments on those expressing completely mainstream - and legal - views on sex and gender.
Inevitably, tribunals have actually followed a variety of these cases. During these, we've heard scary information of ladies dealt with abominably by employers in thrall to advocates who urged and imposed the unlawful adoption of self-ID policies when it concerned single-sex spaces.
We've heard of females bullied and avoided for questioning the right of those born male to self-identify into females's areas, from altering rooms to domestic violence havens.
Equally undoubtedly, those women efficient in resisting have been winning legal actions.
But even a rock strong case does not make it easy to strike back. Good attorneys are expensive and the procedure is draining, both physically and mentally.
For each woman who has thrived in court, there are a lot more for whom introducing a legal case seemed impossible.
The establishment by the author and philanthropist JK Rowling of a fund to support ladies's legal defense of their rights immediately gets rid of any financial barriers to action for those with practical cases.
Author JK Rowling has established a fund to support females's legal security of their rights
The intervention of Ms Rowling should, today, be concentrating minds in human resources departments across the nation.
Since the Supreme Court ruled, last month, that sex, in law, referred biology rather than paperwork, a number of organisations - in both the public and private sectors - have issued declarations revealing their choices to "consider" the implications for their policies.
This widespread and careless complacency stands to cost business - and taxpayer-funded bodies - dear. The facts are easy. If a service is used on a single sex basis that suggests biological sex, not individuality.
The law is the law and no further factor to consider is needed in order for companies to fulfill their commitments under it.
A number of past legal actions after ladies were unjustly dismissed or bullied out of tasks for declining to agree with the mantra "trans women are females" were possible thanks to the support of online crowd-funding campaigns. Ms Rowling regularly promoted - and contributed to - such fundraisers.
Now, she's a one-woman crowd-funder, ready to back the cases of every woman wronged at work for speaking the reality about sex.
The JK Rowling Women's Fund will change the battleground when it comes to ladies discriminated against for their legitimate, reality-based views.
At the heart of industrial tribunals there might be vulnerable individuals playing for high stakes however the human cost indicates absolutely nothing to the insurance companies financing employers' costs. For them, it's everything about the bottom line and the prospect that every woman with a case now has access to the best attorneys in the organization will, I suspect, encourage many to urge settlement rather than the humiliation, and inevitable expense, of more doomed defences.
If one needed proof that females's rights need the fiercest defense, it was available in the reaction to the launch of Ms Rowling's fund.
With delicious pathos, one activist legal representative stated online that the Harry Potter developer had "emerged from the shadows" as the funder of what he explained as the "anti feminist biology is destiny movement".
Ms Rowling has never ever remained in the shadows when it comes to her views on females's rights, has she?
Other reactions were, predictably, more violent in tone.
The continuous tribunal involving nurse Sandie Peggie, claiming discrimination and harassment versus NHS Fife and trans-identifying medical professional Beth Upton, brought the problem of the way so called "gender important" women had been treated at work to wide attention. This is a case that "cut through" with the public and required some politicians to deal with an issue they chose to prevent.
Scottish Labour's leader Anas Sarwar and his deputy, Jackie Baillie, revealed their support for Ms Peggie and stated their belief in the significance of biological sex.
If they 'd known what they know now, they included, they would not have actually voted in favour of the SNP's eventually doomed strategy to permit anyone to self-identify into the legally-recognised sex of their choosing.
But while the Peggie case and the subsequent ruling on the legal meaning of sex by the Supreme Court may have forced an embarrassing U-turn by the Labour management on the matter of biological reality, others remain stubbornly dedicated to defiance of the law.
Naturally, the Scottish Greens - a terrific Wodehousian satire of a revolutionary cell - remain dedicated to making use of single-sex spaces by anybody who feels they belong to that sex.
There have actually been recent declarations of resistance from trade unions, too. Unison has allowed a trans lady to run for a women-only position on its national executive council.
But every act of performative defiance by well-funded trade unions - or taxpayer-funded regional authorities and health boards - is another pricey legal action in the making.
It needs to not have been needed for JK Rowling to ensure to finance the legal expenses of women victimized for their views on sex and gender. Nobody needs to ever have actually lost a job, a promotion, or a contract on the basis of their view that sex is immutable and important.
Nor ought to the author have actually felt it necessary to establish, in 2022, Beira's Place, a women-only support service for victims of sexual violence in the Lothian location.
Ms Rowling's choices to money Beira's Place and to underwrite the legal costs of ladies victimized for thinking in the truth of sex are acts of feminist philanthropy which, in a world not made batty by gender ideology, would have been hailed by our politicians.
I understand that acknowledgment is the last thing on the writer's mind however isn't it downright strange that, when he talks of the achievements of successful Scots, First Minister John Swinney never mentions the support Beira's Place has offered to numerous women?
Money is not the only thing women doing something about it to safeguard their rights require. Ask anyone who has been through the tribunal process and they'll inform you that the emotional support of friends and allies is important.
This convenience will not remain in brief supply for those ladies who receive backing for their cases from the JK Rowling Women's Fund. The writer is part of a worldwide network of campaigners, combating to safeguard women's rights against the needs of trans activists, and calls to action and assistance do not go unheeded.
Let the country's personnels departments brace themselves. A most amazing plot twist has simply been composed.
